I enjoy interviews on craft and the writing life, especially by those writers I especially admire. This way, if I ever meet them I wont feel compelled to ask questions they've heard a million times "What's your writing regime?" "How did you get published?" "What's your inspiration?" .... I hate blending in.
Anyway, lately one topic seems to come up often in these interviews that's especially interesting (and elusive): voice. The question that usually precedes this topic is "What's your advice to new writers?"
In Zen in The Art of Writing, Ray Bradbury describes years of in which he confessed that most of his stories were mere immitation of his favorite writers' voices. He says a writer doesn't truly begin to create worthwhile stuff until finding his or her unique and distinctive style, and this comes not from writing x number of word in a lifetime but from digging deep and creating from the source within. Repetition leads to nothing more than cliche, overdone work. It's lifeless and dishonest. Writing, Bradbury argues, is about finding the emotion and questions that drive us to the pen or keyboard. Once we realize what this motivation is (Bradbury cited numerous childhood nightmares), we've tapped into the thing that matters.
But how does this happen? Is finding one's voice similar to finding religion, finding our lost keys or finally getting the punchline of that joke? Is there a moment when everything just clicks and the writer just knows, from some mysterious and complex series of events, that he's ready. Then everything created after this revelation is somehow better, really ours? Or maybe it's like finding one's voice more like a journey that we must take and once we've overcome certain obstacles and pushed through certain blocks, we've earned it.
Somehow, I think that finding my own writing voice came not from writing but from living through certain things that I knew I had to confront and question circumstances that perplexed me even though I lived through them, possibly even perservered. For me, voice is really something to be found on the page in every piece of writing, to be found again and again, whether through metaphor in fiction or analysis philisophical questioning in nonfiction.
In an interview from The New York Times Magazine, December 5, 1976 Joan Didion says "I write entirely to find out what I’m thinking, what I’m looking at, what I see and what it means." This is one of my favorite quotes about writing because I think Didion provides a clear answer. I interpret her reasoning to mean that we must all write to figure things out, not to emulate or repeat, not to make great plotlines or sketch dynamic characters: those things come.
Because I have this sort of philosophy abou the writing voice, I think I agree with those writers who say go find your own voice. Because like it or not, MFA or no, hot shot literary friends or not, a writer will either find her voice or she won't. When I write I do so to explore myself and the those things that I find particularly perplexing about the world around me, be this in fiction or poetry or any other genre; I don't write what I know--if I wrote about what I knew, I wouldn't write nearly as much!--but what I want to know, and the rest seems to take care of itself. Voice, in this sense, is the consequence of genuine, unabashed curiosity. This can never be cliche.
.....Musical..Chairs .......
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Chapbook release
"As our children walked in circles, their children shook their heads and made their way toward another life; new ghosts remained. And w...
-
I'm always curious about how other people do it. How they write, that is. How consistent they are, how many journals they go through, ho...
-
I don't know about you, but I am happy to put 2012 behind me. This was a year of dualism, filled with disappointment and pain as well as...
-
A few years ago, I was discussing worldly philosophical things with my neighbor. I was enjoying our conversation on perception and how real...
Now I wonder if I've found my voice or not...
ReplyDelete