OK, so publishing is more obtainable. This is good because it allows a greater variety of voices, not just the mentally tormented upper-class or literary namesakes. BUT it also means that it can be very, very tempting to publish prematurely. To write a book for the sole purpose of publication. This, to me, is pointless. Publication
My point? The art of writing can only be fully realized if it is done for it's own sake. When I wrote Musical Chairs,
I'm talking to myself here.... Let me explain why: I have a few hundred pages worth of short stories, and I've found the little devilish version of myself on my right shoulder, barking that I should work on it because it would be publish-worth sooner. The little creative, angelic version, on the other hand, is telling me to work on Absurd Hunger, which won't be done for a year or two or three, because this is the project that consumes my artistic self right now and it is likewise a project that would be compromised if I abandon it for the short story collection, which promises sooner publication. Absurd Hunger is a work I want to spend years on. I want it to be exactly what I envision, not one word short, and I will follow my favorite writers' examples (Jeffrey Eugenides
I'll follow my writing instincts, but I just had to share... I figure if I write it publicly, I'll have to live up to it. And, to acknowledge the distraction, the lure of publication, gives it less power. I've rushed into things my whole life. But right now, I don't have the luxury. One day, perhaps I'll write full-time and won't have to make such difficult choices. But for now, while I'm working full-time and writing on the side, it's a crucial choice. Should I feed creativity or should I feed the dream of being a writer? No easy choice, but I chose art.
Now that you've told us, you gotta stick to your guns.
ReplyDelete